The New York Times and the Washington Post, in editorials published today, opposed efforts by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, to limit EPA's power to restrict GHG emissions.
The Times defended the Obama administration and EPA, calling Murkowski's Senate resolution "mischievous and potentially destructive." The editorial cautioned that Murkowski's proposal would "repudiate years of work by America's most reputable scientists and public health experts. It would prevent the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases from sources like refineries and power plants in the future. And it would send a discouraging message to a federal agency that appears to take its regulatory duties seriously, unlike the Minerals Management Service, which failed to police the oil industry."
The Post struck a more sanguine note, agreeing with Murkowski's stance that Congress should design a more efficient emissions-reduction policy. The Post wrote that the "next logical step is to insist that Congress pass a bill that establishes a price on carbon and rebates the proceeds to consumers, which would be cheaper and more predictable than EPA regulation alone. Instead, Ms. Murkowski favors eliminating Plan B--EPA regulation--before it's clear that Plan A--passing a serious climate bill--will proceed. Plan B isn't the best solution; that's why it's Plan B. But, if designed carefully, it would at least begin to scale back America's greenhouse-gas emissions, a job that it is critical to start as soon as possible. And it would keep pressure on lawmakers to pass climate legislation."
Showing posts with label Obama administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama administration. Show all posts
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Federal Climate Legislation, Energy Monitors Promoted at Solar Meeting
Experts at the American Solar Energy Society meeting in Phoenix said federal climate legislation could have a big impact on energy development, according to the Arizona Republic. Brad Albert, general manager for resource planning at Arizona Public Service, said that a federal climate change policy would encourage the company to invest in renewable power. Albert was quoted as saying: "Having a climate-change policy would do a great deal for anchoring our renewable-energy policy."
Cathy Zoi, assistant Energy secretary for energy efficiency and renewable energy, said the Obama administration still hoped Congress would pass legislation that would regulate CO2 emissions from power plants. She was quoted as saying: "We still are very interested in getting a comprehensive cap on carbon. Energy prices don't now include the pollution."
Speakers at the meeting said devices that showed consumers how much energy they were using and what it cost would help conservation efforts. Zoi was quoted as saying: "We need some type of speedometer on energy. Imagine going to the grocer and buying food, but not knowing what it costs. Now you only know at the end of the month what you have used" in energy.
Cathy Zoi, assistant Energy secretary for energy efficiency and renewable energy, said the Obama administration still hoped Congress would pass legislation that would regulate CO2 emissions from power plants. She was quoted as saying: "We still are very interested in getting a comprehensive cap on carbon. Energy prices don't now include the pollution."
Speakers at the meeting said devices that showed consumers how much energy they were using and what it cost would help conservation efforts. Zoi was quoted as saying: "We need some type of speedometer on energy. Imagine going to the grocer and buying food, but not knowing what it costs. Now you only know at the end of the month what you have used" in energy.
Labels:
Obama administration,
renewable energy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)